The EU, Germany, the Netherlands, Australia and US federal agencies all target 2030 for their most critical systems, and almost every jurisdiction targets 2035 for the rest.
Governments have started to put dates on the move to post-quantum cryptography. This tracker lists the official milestones, who issued them, whom they apply to and how binding they are, with a link to every source. It is updated when a government publishes or changes a timeline.
Timeline at a Glance
Hover or tap a point for the milestone. Colour shows how binding the source is.
⚖️ Mandatory, Guidance, Draft or Announced?
Mandatory for scope means binding on the organisations it covers, for example US federal agencies or national security systems; it does not bind private companies outside that scope. Official guidance comes from a government body but is phrased as a recommendation, even when regulators may later rely on it. Draft documents may still change, and announced policies have been stated publicly but not yet published in full. Several sources disagree on how binding some dates are; we label each one by the wording of the source itself.
All Milestones by Date
| Date | Jurisdiction | Milestone | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passed | Canada | Initial departmental migration plans due; annual progress reporting begins. | Official guidance | Canadian Centre for Cyber SecurityOfficial document |
| United States (federal civilian) | Each agency submits a PQC Migration Plan to OMB and ONCD (120 days after the memo). | Mandatory for scope | White House and OMBOfficial document | |
| European Union | First steps: national PQC roadmaps, cryptographic inventories, quantum risk analysis, pilots for high- and medium-risk use cases. | Official guidance | NIS Cooperation Group, with the European CommissionOfficial document | |
| France | ANSSI aims to require post-quantum cryptography for products entering qualification. | Announced | ANSSIOfficial document | |
| United Kingdom | Migration goals defined, full discovery of cryptography completed, initial plan drafted. | Official guidance | National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)Official document | |
| United States (federal civilian) | TLS 1.3 or a successor supported. | Mandatory for scope | White House and OMBOfficial document | |
| Australia | Stop using traditional asymmetric cryptography (RSA, DH, ECDH, ECDSA). | Official guidance | Australian Signals Directorate (ASD)Official document | |
| European Union | Migration of high-risk use cases completed; quantum-safe software and firmware upgrades enabled by default. | Official guidance | NIS Cooperation Group, with the European CommissionOfficial document | |
| France | Buying products without post-quantum cryptography will no longer be reasonable, according to ANSSI. | Announced | ANSSIOfficial document | |
| Germany | High-risk use cases migrated “as early as possible, at the latest by the end of 2030”. | Official guidance | BMI, BMDS and BSIOfficial document | |
| Netherlands | High-risk use cases migrated; software and firmware use quantum-safe cryptography by default. | Official guidance | Dutch cabinetOfficial document | |
| United States (federal civilian) | PQC key establishment for high-value assets, high-impact systems and highly sensitive data. | Mandatory for scope | White House and OMBOfficial document | |
| United States (national security systems) | Exclusive use of CNSA 2.0 for software and firmware signing and for traditional networking equipment (VPNs, routers). | Mandatory for scope | NSAOfficial document | |
| United States (NIST standards) | RSA and elliptic-curve algorithms at 112-bit security (e.g. RSA-2048, P-224) deprecated. | Draft | NISTOfficial document | |
| Canada | High-priority systems migrated. | Official guidance | Canadian Centre for Cyber SecurityOfficial document | |
| United Kingdom | Highest-priority migration activities completed. | Official guidance | National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)Official document | |
| United States (federal civilian) | PQC digital signatures for the same priority systems. | Mandatory for scope | White House and OMBOfficial document | |
| United States (national security systems) | Exclusive use for web browsers and servers, cloud services, operating systems and niche equipment; custom applications and legacy equipment updated or replaced. | Mandatory for scope | NSAOfficial document | |
| Canada | Remaining systems migrated. | Official guidance | Canadian Centre for Cyber SecurityOfficial document | |
| European Union | Migration of medium-risk use cases completed; low-risk use cases migrated as far as feasible. | Official guidance | NIS Cooperation Group, with the European CommissionOfficial document | |
| Germany | Overall transition largely completed. | Official guidance | BMI, BMDS and BSIOfficial document | |
| Japan | In principle, government agencies complete the migration to PQC. | Official guidance | Inter-ministerial PQC liaison council, Cabinet SecretariatOfficial document | |
| Netherlands | Medium-risk use cases migrated; low-risk use cases migrated as far as possible. | Official guidance | Dutch cabinetOfficial document | |
| United Kingdom | Migration of all systems, services and products completed. | Official guidance | National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)Official document | |
| United States (federal civilian) | Remaining systems migrated, based on risk and availability of commercial products. | Mandatory for scope | White House and OMBOfficial document | |
| United States (national security systems) | All national security systems quantum-resistant (NSM-10 goal). | Mandatory for scope | NSAOfficial document | |
| United States (NIST standards) | All quantum-vulnerable public-key algorithms disallowed. | Draft | NISTOfficial document |
By Jurisdiction
European Union Official guidance
- End of 2026First steps: national PQC roadmaps, cryptographic inventories, quantum risk analysis, pilots for high- and medium-risk use cases.
- End of 2030Migration of high-risk use cases completed; quantum-safe software and firmware upgrades enabled by default.
- End of 2035Migration of medium-risk use cases completed; low-risk use cases migrated as far as feasible.
Germany Official guidance
- End of 2030High-risk use cases migrated “as early as possible, at the latest by the end of 2030”.
- 2035Overall transition largely completed.
United States (federal civilian) Mandatory for scope
- 22 Oct 2026Each agency submits a PQC Migration Plan to OMB and ONCD (120 days after the memo).
- 2 Jan 2030TLS 1.3 or a successor supported.
- End of 2030PQC key establishment for high-value assets, high-impact systems and highly sensitive data.
- 2031PQC digital signatures for the same priority systems.
- 2035Remaining systems migrated, based on risk and availability of commercial products.
United States (national security systems) Mandatory for scope
- 2030Exclusive use of CNSA 2.0 for software and firmware signing and for traditional networking equipment (VPNs, routers).
- 2033Exclusive use for web browsers and servers, cloud services, operating systems and niche equipment; custom applications and legacy equipment updated or replaced.
- 2035All national security systems quantum-resistant (NSM-10 goal).
United States (NIST standards) Draft
- 2030RSA and elliptic-curve algorithms at 112-bit security (e.g. RSA-2048, P-224) deprecated.
- 2035All quantum-vulnerable public-key algorithms disallowed.
United Kingdom Official guidance
- 2028Migration goals defined, full discovery of cryptography completed, initial plan drafted.
- 2031Highest-priority migration activities completed.
- 2035Migration of all systems, services and products completed.
Canada Official guidance
- April 2026Initial departmental migration plans due; annual progress reporting begins.
- End of 2031High-priority systems migrated.
- End of 2035Remaining systems migrated.
Australia Official guidance
- End of 2030Stop using traditional asymmetric cryptography (RSA, DH, ECDH, ECDSA).
Netherlands Official guidance
- End of 2030High-risk use cases migrated; software and firmware use quantum-safe cryptography by default.
- End of 2035Medium-risk use cases migrated; low-risk use cases migrated as far as possible.
France Announced
- From 2027ANSSI aims to require post-quantum cryptography for products entering qualification.
- After 2030Buying products without post-quantum cryptography will no longer be reasonable, according to ANSSI.
Japan Official guidance
- 2035In principle, government agencies complete the migration to PQC.
What's New
- Tracker launched with 11 sources across the EU, Germany, the United States, the UK, Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, France and Japan, including Germany's 12 October 2026 guideline and the US OMB memorandum M-26-15.
Methodology
We list milestones from national governments, cybersecurity agencies and standards bodies that set a dated target for migrating to post-quantum cryptography. Each jurisdiction shows when we last checked it and whether that check was against the primary document or against reputable secondary reporting. This tracker summarises public documents; it is not legal advice. Corrections and additions are welcome via the contact form below.
Download the Data
- 📄 pqc-deadlines.csv: every milestone with status, scope and source (CC BY 4.0).
How to Cite This Tracker
APA: PostQuantumSecurity.org. (2026–). Post-quantum migration deadlines by country [Live tracker]. https://www.postquantumsecurity.org/trackers/pqc-deadlines.html
Please include the "Last updated" date shown at the top of the page.