Live tracker

Post-Quantum Migration Deadlines by Country

Type: Live Tracker
Last updated: October 2026
2030 the year most high-risk systems should be quantum-safe

The EU, Germany, the Netherlands, Australia and US federal agencies all target 2030 for their most critical systems, and almost every jurisdiction targets 2035 for the rest.

Governments have started to put dates on the move to post-quantum cryptography. This tracker lists the official milestones, who issued them, whom they apply to and how binding they are, with a link to every source. It is updated when a government publishes or changes a timeline.

Timeline at a Glance

Milestones by jurisdiction, 2026–2035
Post-quantum migration milestones by jurisdiction, 2026 to 2035European Union: End of 2026, End of 2030, End of 2035; Germany: End of 2030, 2035; United States (federal civilian): 22 Oct 2026, 2 Jan 2030, End of 2030, 2031, 2035; United States (national security systems): 2030, 2033, 2035; United States (NIST standards): 2030, 2035; United Kingdom: 2028, 2031, 2035; Canada: April 2026, End of 2031, End of 2035; Australia: End of 2030; Netherlands: End of 2030, End of 2035; France: From 2027, After 2030; Japan: 20352026202720282029203020312032203320342035Last updateEuropean UnionEuropean Union, End of 2026: First steps: national PQC roadmaps, cryptographic inventories, quantum risk analysis, pilots for high- and medium-risk use cases.European Union, End of 2030: Migration of high-risk use cases completed; quantum-safe software and firmware upgrades enabled by default.European Union, End of 2035: Migration of medium-risk use cases completed; low-risk use cases migrated as far as feasible.GermanyGermany, End of 2030: High-risk use cases migrated “as early as possible, at the latest by the end of 2030”.Germany, 2035: Overall transition largely completed.United States (federal civilian)United States (federal civilian), 22 Oct 2026: Each agency submits a PQC Migration Plan to OMB and ONCD (120 days after the memo).United States (federal civilian), 2 Jan 2030: TLS 1.3 or a successor supported.United States (federal civilian), End of 2030: PQC key establishment for high-value assets, high-impact systems and highly sensitive data.United States (federal civilian), 2031: PQC digital signatures for the same priority systems.United States (federal civilian), 2035: Remaining systems migrated, based on risk and availability of commercial products.United States (national security systems)United States (national security systems), 2030: Exclusive use of CNSA 2.0 for software and firmware signing and for traditional networking equipment (VPNs, routers).United States (national security systems), 2033: Exclusive use for web browsers and servers, cloud services, operating systems and niche equipment; custom applications and legacy equipment updated or replaced.United States (national security systems), 2035: All national security systems quantum-resistant (NSM-10 goal).United States (NIST standards)United States (NIST standards), 2030: RSA and elliptic-curve algorithms at 112-bit security (e.g. RSA-2048, P-224) deprecated.United States (NIST standards), 2035: All quantum-vulnerable public-key algorithms disallowed.United KingdomUnited Kingdom, 2028: Migration goals defined, full discovery of cryptography completed, initial plan drafted.United Kingdom, 2031: Highest-priority migration activities completed.United Kingdom, 2035: Migration of all systems, services and products completed.CanadaCanada, April 2026: Initial departmental migration plans due; annual progress reporting begins.Canada, End of 2031: High-priority systems migrated.Canada, End of 2035: Remaining systems migrated.AustraliaAustralia, End of 2030: Stop using traditional asymmetric cryptography (RSA, DH, ECDH, ECDSA).NetherlandsNetherlands, End of 2030: High-risk use cases migrated; software and firmware use quantum-safe cryptography by default.Netherlands, End of 2035: Medium-risk use cases migrated; low-risk use cases migrated as far as possible.FranceFrance, From 2027: ANSSI aims to require post-quantum cryptography for products entering qualification.France, After 2030: Buying products without post-quantum cryptography will no longer be reasonable, according to ANSSI.JapanJapan, 2035: In principle, government agencies complete the migration to PQC.Mandatory for scopeOfficial guidanceAnnouncedDraft

Hover or tap a point for the milestone. Colour shows how binding the source is.

⚖️ Mandatory, Guidance, Draft or Announced?

Mandatory for scope means binding on the organisations it covers, for example US federal agencies or national security systems; it does not bind private companies outside that scope. Official guidance comes from a government body but is phrased as a recommendation, even when regulators may later rely on it. Draft documents may still change, and announced policies have been stated publicly but not yet published in full. Several sources disagree on how binding some dates are; we label each one by the wording of the source itself.

All Milestones by Date

DateJurisdictionMilestoneStatusSource
Passed Canada Initial departmental migration plans due; annual progress reporting begins. Official guidance Canadian Centre for Cyber SecurityOfficial document
United States (federal civilian) Each agency submits a PQC Migration Plan to OMB and ONCD (120 days after the memo). Mandatory for scope White House and OMBOfficial document
European Union First steps: national PQC roadmaps, cryptographic inventories, quantum risk analysis, pilots for high- and medium-risk use cases. Official guidance NIS Cooperation Group, with the European CommissionOfficial document
France ANSSI aims to require post-quantum cryptography for products entering qualification. Announced ANSSIOfficial document
United Kingdom Migration goals defined, full discovery of cryptography completed, initial plan drafted. Official guidance National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)Official document
United States (federal civilian) TLS 1.3 or a successor supported. Mandatory for scope White House and OMBOfficial document
Australia Stop using traditional asymmetric cryptography (RSA, DH, ECDH, ECDSA). Official guidance Australian Signals Directorate (ASD)Official document
European Union Migration of high-risk use cases completed; quantum-safe software and firmware upgrades enabled by default. Official guidance NIS Cooperation Group, with the European CommissionOfficial document
France Buying products without post-quantum cryptography will no longer be reasonable, according to ANSSI. Announced ANSSIOfficial document
Germany High-risk use cases migrated “as early as possible, at the latest by the end of 2030”. Official guidance BMI, BMDS and BSIOfficial document
Netherlands High-risk use cases migrated; software and firmware use quantum-safe cryptography by default. Official guidance Dutch cabinetOfficial document
United States (federal civilian) PQC key establishment for high-value assets, high-impact systems and highly sensitive data. Mandatory for scope White House and OMBOfficial document
United States (national security systems) Exclusive use of CNSA 2.0 for software and firmware signing and for traditional networking equipment (VPNs, routers). Mandatory for scope NSAOfficial document
United States (NIST standards) RSA and elliptic-curve algorithms at 112-bit security (e.g. RSA-2048, P-224) deprecated. Draft NISTOfficial document
Canada High-priority systems migrated. Official guidance Canadian Centre for Cyber SecurityOfficial document
United Kingdom Highest-priority migration activities completed. Official guidance National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)Official document
United States (federal civilian) PQC digital signatures for the same priority systems. Mandatory for scope White House and OMBOfficial document
United States (national security systems) Exclusive use for web browsers and servers, cloud services, operating systems and niche equipment; custom applications and legacy equipment updated or replaced. Mandatory for scope NSAOfficial document
Canada Remaining systems migrated. Official guidance Canadian Centre for Cyber SecurityOfficial document
European Union Migration of medium-risk use cases completed; low-risk use cases migrated as far as feasible. Official guidance NIS Cooperation Group, with the European CommissionOfficial document
Germany Overall transition largely completed. Official guidance BMI, BMDS and BSIOfficial document
Japan In principle, government agencies complete the migration to PQC. Official guidance Inter-ministerial PQC liaison council, Cabinet SecretariatOfficial document
Netherlands Medium-risk use cases migrated; low-risk use cases migrated as far as possible. Official guidance Dutch cabinetOfficial document
United Kingdom Migration of all systems, services and products completed. Official guidance National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)Official document
United States (federal civilian) Remaining systems migrated, based on risk and availability of commercial products. Mandatory for scope White House and OMBOfficial document
United States (national security systems) All national security systems quantum-resistant (NSM-10 goal). Mandatory for scope NSAOfficial document
United States (NIST standards) All quantum-vulnerable public-key algorithms disallowed. Draft NISTOfficial document

By Jurisdiction

European Union Official guidance

NIS Cooperation Group, with the European Commission: Coordinated Implementation Roadmap for the Transition to PQC (23 June 2025).
Scope: All Member States; public administrations and critical sectors.
Source

  • End of 2026First steps: national PQC roadmaps, cryptographic inventories, quantum risk analysis, pilots for high- and medium-risk use cases.
  • End of 2030Migration of high-risk use cases completed; quantum-safe software and firmware upgrades enabled by default.
  • End of 2035Migration of medium-risk use cases completed; low-risk use cases migrated as far as feasible.

Germany Official guidance

BMI, BMDS and BSI: Guideline for the national implementation of the EU PQC roadmap (12 October 2026).
Scope: Federal, state and municipal administrations; companies, including critical-infrastructure operators.
Source

  • End of 2030High-risk use cases migrated “as early as possible, at the latest by the end of 2030”.
  • 2035Overall transition largely completed.

United States (federal civilian) Mandatory for scope

White House and OMB: Executive Order “Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks” (22 June 2026) and OMB Memorandum M-26-15 (24 June 2026).
Scope: Federal civilian agencies; excludes national security systems.
Source

  • 22 Oct 2026Each agency submits a PQC Migration Plan to OMB and ONCD (120 days after the memo).
  • 2 Jan 2030TLS 1.3 or a successor supported.
  • End of 2030PQC key establishment for high-value assets, high-impact systems and highly sensitive data.
  • 2031PQC digital signatures for the same priority systems.
  • 2035Remaining systems migrated, based on risk and availability of commercial products.

United States (national security systems) Mandatory for scope

NSA: Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite 2.0 (CNSA 2.0).
Scope: National security systems and their vendors.
Source

  • 2030Exclusive use of CNSA 2.0 for software and firmware signing and for traditional networking equipment (VPNs, routers).
  • 2033Exclusive use for web browsers and servers, cloud services, operating systems and niche equipment; custom applications and legacy equipment updated or replaced.
  • 2035All national security systems quantum-resistant (NSM-10 goal).

United States (NIST standards) Draft

NIST: NIST IR 8547, Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (initial public draft, November 2024).
Scope: Algorithms approved for federal use; widely followed by industry.
Source

  • 2030RSA and elliptic-curve algorithms at 112-bit security (e.g. RSA-2048, P-224) deprecated.
  • 2035All quantum-vulnerable public-key algorithms disallowed.

United Kingdom Official guidance

National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC): Timelines for migration to post-quantum cryptography (March 2025).
Scope: Mainly large organisations, critical national infrastructure and bespoke IT.
Source

  • 2028Migration goals defined, full discovery of cryptography completed, initial plan drafted.
  • 2031Highest-priority migration activities completed.
  • 2035Migration of all systems, services and products completed.

Canada Official guidance

Canadian Centre for Cyber Security: Roadmap for the migration to PQC for the Government of Canada, ITSM.40.001 (23 June 2025).
Scope: Federal departments; non-classified systems.
Source

  • April 2026Initial departmental migration plans due; annual progress reporting begins.
  • End of 2031High-priority systems migrated.
  • End of 2035Remaining systems migrated.

Australia Official guidance

Australian Signals Directorate (ASD): Information Security Manual and “Planning for post-quantum cryptography”.
Scope: Government and organisations following the ISM.
Source

  • End of 2030Stop using traditional asymmetric cryptography (RSA, DH, ECDH, ECDSA).

Netherlands Official guidance

Dutch cabinet: Government-wide quantum strategy, Rijksbrede Quantumstrategie (October 2026).
Scope: Central-government organisations.
Source

  • End of 2030High-risk use cases migrated; software and firmware use quantum-safe cryptography by default.
  • End of 2035Medium-risk use cases migrated; low-risk use cases migrated as far as possible.

France Announced

ANSSI: Published position on post-quantum cryptography and product qualification.
Scope: Security products entering ANSSI qualification; purchasing advice for all organisations.
Source

  • From 2027ANSSI aims to require post-quantum cryptography for products entering qualification.
  • After 2030Buying products without post-quantum cryptography will no longer be reasonable, according to ANSSI.

Japan Official guidance

Inter-ministerial PQC liaison council, Cabinet Secretariat: Interim report on PQC migration for government agencies (November 2025).
Scope: Government agencies.
Source

  • 2035In principle, government agencies complete the migration to PQC.

What's New

Methodology

We list milestones from national governments, cybersecurity agencies and standards bodies that set a dated target for migrating to post-quantum cryptography. Each jurisdiction shows when we last checked it and whether that check was against the primary document or against reputable secondary reporting. This tracker summarises public documents; it is not legal advice. Corrections and additions are welcome via the contact form below.

Download the Data

How to Cite This Tracker

APA: PostQuantumSecurity.org. (2026–). Post-quantum migration deadlines by country [Live tracker]. https://www.postquantumsecurity.org/trackers/pqc-deadlines.html

Please include the "Last updated" date shown at the top of the page.

Related Analysis